2012年11月20日 星期二


Massive Pulmonary Hemorrhage After Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy


Anesthesia and Analgesia vol. 99 no. 3672-675





Figure 1. A general algorithm for the approach to postcardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) pulmonary hemorrhage. PEEP = positive end-expiratory pressure; FFP = fresh frozen plasma; PAP = positive airway pressure.

During a second attempt at separation from CPB, PEEP 10 cm H2O was applied; phenylephrine 10 mg and vasopressin 20 U diluted to 10 mL with normal saline were administered via the endotracheal tube;

pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE); cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)



Alveolar hemorrhage associated with lupus nephritis

Print version ISSN 0102-3586
J. Pneumologia vol.29 no.6 São Paulo Nov./Dec. 2003
CASE REPORT

Ricardo Henrique de Oliveira Braga TeixeiraI; Marcel HiratsukaII; Flávia Calderini RosaII; Rogério SouzaIII; Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de CarvalhoIV

ABSTRACT
Alveolar hemorrhage leading to respiratory failure is uncommon. Various etiologies have been reported, including systemic lupus erythematosus, which generally presents as pulmonary-renal syndrome. It is believed that the pathogenesis of microangiopathy is related to deposits of immune complexes that lead to activation of cellular apoptosis. We report two cases of alveolar hemorrhage and respiratory failure, both requiring mechanical ventilation. The two cases had opposite outcomes after pharmacological therapy. In one of the cases, the presence of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibodies demonstrates the multiplicity of physiopathological mechanisms that may be involved. This multiplicity of mechanisms provides a possible explanation for the heterogeneous responses to the available treatments.
Key words: Lupus erythematosus systemic/etiology. Lupus nephritis/etiology. Respiratory insufficiency/complications.

Abbreviations used in this paper:
GBM
Glomerular basement membrane
SLE
Systemic lupus erythematosus
PEEP
Positive end-expiratory pressure
ICU
Intensive care unit
Introduction
Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage leading to respiratory failure is uncommon. Various etiologies have been reported, including infections, inhaled toxins, coagulation disorders, Goodpastures syndrome, microscopic polyangiitis and Wegeners granulomatosis, as well as various types of collagenosis, such as scleroderma and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).(1,2)
Pulmonary-renal syndrome is characterized by the occurrence of both alveolar hemorrhage and glomerular nephritis and is frequently associated with the presence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies or anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) antibodies. The type of injury, (alveolar, glomerular or both) determines the evolution and prognosis of the syndrome.(1)
A diagnosis of alveolar hemorrhage is made through the identification of acute pulmonary symptoms. Such symptoms include hemoptysis, new alveolar infiltrate (seen in chest radiographs), lower concentrations of hemoglobin and the presence of blood or hemosiderin-laden macrophages in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, although diagnosis can be made in the absence of some of these symptoms.(1,3)
In SLE patients, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage is quite uncommon, occurring in only about 2% of cases, and is often associated with higher mortality rates. In most cases, concomitant renal involvement is also observed.(3)
We report 2 cases of lupus nephritis-related alveolar hemorrhage treated between June and August of 2002 in the respiratory intensive care unit (Respiratory ICU, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine).
 Case reports
Case 1
The patient was an 18-year-old female patient who, due to cutaneous and articular symptoms, had been diagnosed 2.5 years prior with SLE, for which she was being treated with 250 mg of chloroquine/day.
Without consulting a physician, the patient suspended her medication at 1 month prior to admission, consequently developing progressive dyspnea (even during minimal exertion) and muscle weakness. In addition, 4 days before admission, she began to suffer from diuresis. She was taken to the emergency service after an acute attack of dyspnea.
The patient presented with intense pulmonary discomfort, tachypnea (30 breaths per minute), and hypoxemia (88% oxygen saturation in room air). She claimed to have no expectoration. A chest radiograph revealed bilateral alveolar infiltrate and small pleural effusions (Figure 1A). Laboratory tests showed anemia, normal leucocyte counts, impaired renal function and evidence of active inflammation. Since there was no clear evidence of infection, alveolar hemorrhage was suspected.
The patient was transferred to the ICU and submitted to non-invasive ventilation. Intubation was considered necessary due to her worsening condition. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed and cultures obtained. The cultures tested negative, which is indicative of alveolar hemorrhage. The ventilation was adjusted to allow up to 22 cm H2O of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), with partial response in the oxygenation. Intravenous methylprednisolone was administered as pulse therapy and the chloroquine was maintained. Since the patient did not respond, she was submitted to plasmapheresis for 3 days, and cyclophosphamide was introduced for immunosuppression. After new episodes of bleeding, gamma globulin was administered. However, none of these procedures had any effect on the bleeding episodes, which continued to occur every 3 to 7 days.
Upon admission, the patient had presented compromised renal function, evidenced by disproportionately increased levels of creatinine (urea = 60 mg/dL; creatinine = 2.1 mg/dL). This condition worsened over the course of treatment, despite fluid replacement and the previously described immunosuppression therapy. From day 42 onward, the patient required dialysis. On day 61 of treatment, intracranial hypertension was detected, and computer tomography scans revealed a large area of ischemia in the right cerebral hemisphere, with intense edema and mid-line shift. The patient underwent decompressive craniectomy, but died during the immediate post-operative period.
Case 2
A 40-year-old female patient had, 17 years earlier, been diagnosed with SLE. Since then, she had been suffering from malar erythema, serositis and arthritis in both the large and small joints. In addition, she had developed renal involvement, including proteinuria and reduced creatinine clearance (40 mL/min). During that time, a renal biopsy was performed, revealing membranous and mesangial glomerulopathy.
Her renal function continued to deteriorate until 5 years prior to her admission to our hospital, at which time partial improvement was achieved through the use of pulse therapy with cyclophosphamide. A regime of mycophenolate mofetil was initiated 2 years later (3 years prior to being admitted to our hospital).
At 1 month before admission to our hospital, her renal function worsened. Proteinuria, dyslipidemia, generalized edema (anasarca), and anuria were all increased and she required hospitalization. Pulse therapy with methylprednisolone was administered, to no effect. She was then given pulse therapy with cyclophosphamide. Again, there was no improvement, and a program of hemodialysis was initiated.
Upon admission to our facilities, the patient presented progressive dyspnea and decreased hemoglobin, as well as alveolar infiltrate in the chest radiograph (Figure 2A). After hemoptysis and a drop in arterial saturation, as well as a severe episode of tachypnea, were observed, the patient was transferred to the ICU. She was intubated and submitted to bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage, which revealed bleeding. Cytological examination of the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid revealed hemosiderin-laden macrophages, confirming the diagnosis of alveolar hemorrhage.
While in the ICU, ventilation was set at 18 cm H2O of PEEP and a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg, and there were not other bleeding episodes. Ventilation was maintained for 5 days and there was a rapid improvement in her respiratory pattern. She was then extubated and ventilation was maintained through use of an oxygen mask in combination with periods of non-invasive ventilation. Until the patient was discharged from the ICU, she was under monotherapy with prednisone.

Discussion
Although SLE-related alveolar hemorrhage is quite uncommon (found in only 2% of lupus patients), the prognosis is always negative and the mortality rate is between 70 and 90%.(1,4) Histological studies have shown that, in about 70% of pulmonary biopsies, there is little inflammatory activity and a predominance of hemorrhagic characteristics, whereas, in the remaining 30%, histological changes are compatible with neutrophilic capillaritis or diffuse alveolar damage.(4)
In approximately 75% of SLE-related alveolar hemorrhage cases, immunocomplex deposits have been observed in the alveolar wall.(4) However, other histological studies have shown that most cases are characterized by hemorrhage involving minimal inflammation (with neutrophilic capillaritis in only 7% of cases).(5)
Under electron microscopy, immunocomplex deposits, characteristic of class IV lupus nephritis, are seen in the alveolar wall. In cases involving renal microangiopathy, such deposits are found in the subendothelial region of the glomerular capillary basement membrane. In the literature, most cases of renal microangiopathy have been attributed to class III or IV lupus nephritis. Evidence of microangiopathy is uncommon in class II (mesangial) or V (membranous) lupus nephritis, except when an increase in SLE activity leads to impaired renal function.(3,4)
In our study, both patients presented an acute reduction in renal function. In order to evaluate autoimmunity in these 2 patients, we measured titers of anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) antibodies, which are associated with Goodpastures syndrome and are considered to be one of the most prevalent indicators of pulmonary-renal syndrome.
Although anti-GBM titers were undetectable in case 1, it must be taken into consideration that the patient had already been treated with pulse corticosteroid therapy, immunosuppressant drugs and plasmapheresis, all of which may have affected titer determination. In case 2, in which the patient presented class V-type renal lesion, anti-GBM titers were significant. Although, histologically speaking, this is not the most common type of SLE-related microangiopathy, progression to the proliferative type is possible, in which case the impaired renal function would be expected.
However, it is still not possible to identify all factors responsible for the lesion related to the alveolar hemorrhage, or for the SLE-related renal microangiopathy. Neither is it possible to identify which factors might be responsible for the different outcomes in both patients, especially for the differing responses to the immunosuppression therapy. However, similarly divergent patient responses have been seen in other forms of vasculitis involving pulmonary complications.(6)
Nevertheless, the use of protective strategies, such as maintaining low tidal volumes and high levels of PEEP during mechanical ventilation, might be fundamental in treating patients with symptoms of severe respiratory insufficiency. In a study involving respiratory distress syndrome patients, including some with leptospirosis-induced alveolar hemorrhage and other forms of pulmonary vasculitis, the use of such ventilation strategies led to lower mortality rates.(7)
Despite the fact that this condition is rare, early diagnosis and the introduction of measures for respiratory system protection might be beneficial in cases of SLE-related alveolar hemorrhage. In addition, greater understanding of the physiopathology of this condition could lead to the development of more effective pharmacological treatments. 
References
1. Bosch X, Font J. The pulmonary-renal syndrome: a poorly understood clinicopathologic condition. Lupus 1999;8:258-62.         [ Links ]
2. Bar J, Ehrenfeld M, Rozenman J, Perelman M, Sidi Y, Gur H. Pulmonary-renal syndrome in systemic sclerosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2001; 30:403-10.         [ Links ]
3. Lee JG, Joo KW, Chung WK, Jung YC, Zheung SH, Yoon HJ, et al. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in lupus nephritis. Clin Nephrol 2001;55: 282-8.         [ Links ]
4. Hughson MD, He Z, Henegar J, McMurray R. Alveolar hemorrhage and renal microangiopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001;125:475-83.         [ Links ]
5. Specks U. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage syndromes.Curr Opin Rheumatol 2001;13:12-7.         [ Links ]
6. Lauque D, Cadranel J, Lazor R, Pourrat J, Ronco P, Guillevin L, et al. Microscopic polyangiitis with alveolar hemorrhage. A study of 29 cases and review of the literature. Groupe d'Etudes et de Recherche sur les Maladies "Orphelines"Pulmonaires (GERM"O"P). Medicine 2000;79: 222-33.         [ Links ]
7. Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, Magaldi RB, Schettino GP, Lorenzi-Filho G, et al. Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998;338: 347-54.        [ Links ]

Hemorrhaging: Pulmonary hemorrhage (P-Hem) – TheTreatments

Home of Kyle J. Norton for The Better of Living & Living Health   Hemorrhaging is also known as bleeding or abnormal bleeding as a result of blood loss due to internal.external leaking from blood vessels or through the skin.
 I. Classifications of Hemorrhaging
According to the classification from the American College of Surgeons’ Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS), Hemorrhaging is divided into 4 classes, depending to the volumes of blood loss and other factors
Classification of hemorrhage
Class

Parameter
I
II
III
IV
Blood loss (ml)
<750
750–1500
1500–2000
>2000
Blood loss (%)
<15%
15–30%
30–40%
>40%
Pulse rate (beats/min)
<100
>100
>120
>140
Blood pressure
Normal
Decreased
Decreased
Decreased
Respiratory rate (breaths/min)
14–20
20–30
30–40
>35
Urine output (ml/hour)
>30
20–30
5–15
Negligible
CNS symptoms
Normal
Anxious
Confused
Lethargic

Modified from Committee on Trauma. CNS = central nervous system(1a).
II.  Types of hemorrhaging E.4. Treatments 
Treatments depend on the diagnosis of each patient, if the underlined cause is due to medication, then medicine has to be stopped. 

1. Immediate treatment
According to the Intensive Care Nursery House Staff Manual immediate treatment of P-Hem should include tracheal suction, oxygen and positive pressure ventilation. To assist in decreasing P-Hem, mean airway pressure should be increased, either by a relatively high PEEP (i.e., 6 to 10 cmH2O) or by high frequency ventilation(15). In the infants, reserachers at suggested that current management of PH in VLBW infants includes ventilatory support using high positive end expiratory pressure, transfusion of blood and blood products to support the circulation and correct any hemostatic or coagulation defects and evaluation and treatment for patent ductus arteriousus (PDA). These strategies are often ineffective in preventing a poor outcome. rFVIIa is effective in controlling life-threatening hemorrhage in patients with hemophilia A and B with inhibitors, and innonhemophiliacs with a variety of inherited or acquired hemostatic defects including platelet disorders, liver disease and von Willebrand’s disease.(15a)
 2. Embolization – Interventional treatment of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations
Acording to the study of Dr. Andersen PE and Dr. Kjeldsen AD. at the Odense University Hospital ”Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVM) are congenital vascular communications in the lungs.  The generally accepted treatment strategy of first choice is embolization of the afferent arteries to the arteriovenous malformations. It is a minimally invasive procedure and at the same time a lungpreserving treatment with a very high technical success, high effectiveness and low morbidity and mortality. Embolization prevents cerebral stroke and abscess as well as pulmonary haemorrhage and further raises the functional level. Embolization is a well-established method of treating PAVM, with a significant effect on oxygenation of the blood. Screening for PAVM in patients at risk is recommended, especially in patients with HHT(16).
3. Corticosteroids 
There is a report of a patient suffered from acute glomerulonephritis with modest renal impairmentand life-threatening pulmonary hemorrhage. The pulmonary hemorrhage caused severe hypoxia thatnecessitated artificial ventilation. As a last resort, 1 g/day of methylprednisolone was administered intravenously. Rapid cessation of pulmonary hemorrhage ensued with clearing of the lungs fields. the suggestion of large doses of glucocorticosteroids should be administered to patients with life-threatening pulmonary hemorrhage before considering bilateral nephrectomy, especially if the renal function is still adequate. Bilateral nephrectomy is an irreversible approach and, as with massive doses of steroids, has yet to be proved to be a consistently effective mode of therapy(17).
Sources
(1a) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065003/table/T1/   
(15) http://www.ucsfbenioffchildrens.org/pdf/manuals/29_PulmHemorrhage.pdf
(15a) http://www.nature.com/jp/journal/v22/n8/full/7210787a.html
(16) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21160695 
(17) http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=689575 




Positive End-Expiratory Pressure


  1. Indications
    1. Pulmonary condition with widespread alveolar collapse
    2. Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
      1. PEEP increases lung compliance
      2. PEEP decreases intrapulmonary shunting
      3. Increases PO2 and allows lower FIO2 below 60%
      4. May increase dead space ventilation
        1. Overdistends normal lung
    3. Pulmonary Edema
      1. PEEP allows decrease in FIO2 below 60%
      2. PEEP may increase extravascular lung water
  2. Disproved uses of PEEP
    1. Localized Lung Disease (e.g. lobar Pneumonia)
      1. PEEP may worsen Hypoxemia
        1. Overdistends normal lung
        2. Directs blood flow to diseased lung
      2. PEEP not recommended
        1. Unless selectively applied to diseased lung
    2. Prophylactic PEEP
      1. PEEP does not reduce ARDS Incidence
    3. Routine PEEP
      1. PEEP does not appear indiscriminately beneficial
    4. Mediastinal Bleeding
      1. PEEP does not protect against mediastinal bleeding
  3. Physiology
    1. PEEP maintains small end-expiratory pressure
      1. Helps to prevent alveolar collapse
      2. Promotes alveolar-capillary gas exchange
    2. Increases lung function parameters
      1. Increases Functional Residual Capacity (FRC)
    3. Increases cardiac output with low airway pressures
      1. May result in increased Oxygen Delivery
  4. Dosing
    1. Usual PEEP setting: 5 to 10 cm H2O
  5. Complications
    1. Decreased cardiac output
      1. Associated with higher airway pressures
      2. Associated with decreased ventricular filling
    2. Barotrauma
    3. Fluid Retention
    4. Intracranial Hypertension
  6. References
    1. Marino (1991) ICU Book, Lea & Febiger, p. 375-9

2012年11月16日 星期五


Comparison of Inhaled Iloprost and Nitric Oxide in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension During Weaning From Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial


Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 406-413, June 2008

    Objective: 
    The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of inhaled iloprost and nitric oxide (iNO) in reducing pulmonary hypertension (PHT) during cardiac surgery immediately after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
    Design: 
    A prospective randomized study.
    Setting: 
    A single-center university hospital.
    Participants:
     Forty-six patients with PHT (mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥26 mmHg preoperatively at rest, after anesthesia induction, and at the end of CPB) scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery were enrolled.
    Interventions: 
    Patients were randomly allocated to receive iloprost (group A, n = 23) or iNO (group B, n = 23) during weaning from CPB.
    Measurements and Main Results:
     Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and left atrial pressure were recorded continuously. Iloprost and iNO were administered immediately after the end of CPB before heparin reversal. Both substances caused significant reductions in mean PAP (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and significant increases in cardiac output 30 minutes after administration (p < 0.0001). However, in a direct comparison, iloprost caused significantly greater reductions in PVR (p = 0.013) and mPAP (p = 0.0006) and a significantly greater increase in cardiac output (p = 0.002) compared with iNO.
    Conclusions:
     PHT after weaning from CPB was significantly reduced by the selective pulmonary vasodilators iNO and iloprost. However, in a direct comparison of the 2 substances, iloprost was found to be significantly more effective.

A comparison of the acute hemodynamic effects of inhaled nitric oxide and aerosolized iloprost in primary pulmonary hypertension FREE

Marius M. Hoeper, MD; Horst Olschewski, MD; Hossein A. Ghofrani, MD; Heinrike Wilkens, MD; Joerg Winkler, MD; Mathias M. Borst, MD; Jost Niedermeyer, MD; Helmut Fabel, MD; Werner Seeger, MD
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(1):176-182. 
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
Inhalation of the stable prostacyclin analogue iloprost has recently been described as a novel therapeutic strategy for PPH and may offer an alternative to continuous intravenous infusion of prostacyclin or inhalation of NO.
METHODS
During right heart catheterization, 35 patients with PPH sequentially inhaled 40 ppm of NO and 14 to 17 μg of iloprost, and the effects on hemodynamics and blood gases were monitored.
RESULTS
Both NO and iloprost caused significant increases in cardiac output, mixed-venous oxygen saturation and stroke volume as well as significant decreases in pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, whereas only inhaled iloprost significantly increased the arterial Po2 (p = 0.01). Compared with inhaled NO, aerosolized iloprost was more effective in reducing pulmonary artery pressure (−8.3 ± 7.5 mm Hg vs. −4.3 ± 8.8 mm Hg; p = 0.0001) and the pulmonary vascular resistance (−447 ± 340 dynes·s·cm−5 vs. −183 ± 305 dyne·s·cm−5; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, aerosolized iloprost caused a significantly greater increase of the cardiac output compared with NO (+0.7 ± 0.6 liter/min vs. +0.3 ± 0.4 liter/min; p = 0.0002) and had a more pronounced effect on the mixed-venous oxygen saturation (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS

During acute drug testing, aerosolized iloprost was more potent than inhaled NO as a pulmonary vasodilator in PPH at the doses used in this study.

比較 iNO與噴霧吸入ILOPROST治療CABG術後肺高壓小孩的效果



Comparison of inhaled nitric oxide with aerosolized iloprost for treatment of pulmonary hypertension in children after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery


Volume 100Issue 7pp 595-602

Abstract

Objectives

Pilot study to compare the effect of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and aerosolized iloprost in preventing perioperative pulmonary hypertensive crises (PHTCs).

Background

Guidelines recommend the use of iNO to treat PHTCs, but treatment with iNO is not an ideal vasodilator. Aerosolized iloprost may be a possible alternative to iNO in this setting.

Methods

Investigator-initiated, open-label, randomized clinical trial in 15 infants (age range 77–257 days) with left-to-right shunt (11 out of 15 with additional trisomy 21), and pulmonary hypertension (i.e. mean pulmonary artery pressure [PAP] >25 mmHg) after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients were randomized to treatment with iNO at 10 ppm or aerosolized iloprost at 0.5 µg/kg (every 2 h). The observation period was 72 h after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of PHTCs; the secondary endpoints were mean PAP, duration of mechanical ventilation, safety of administration, and in-hospital mortality.

Results

Seven patients received iNO and eight patients received iloprost. During the observation period, 13 of the 15 patients had at least one major or minor PHTC. There was no difference between the groups with regard to the frequency of PHTCs, mean PAP and duration of mechanical ventilation (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

In this pilot study, aerosolized iloprost had a favorable safety profile. Larger trials are needed to compare its efficacy to iNO for the treatment of perioperative pulmonary hypertension. However, neither treatment alone abolished the occurrence of PHTCs.